Your 90-Day AR Analysis is complimentary - See your true collection gap.

Read our latest medical billing services and RCM related blogs

How Do You Build Wound Care EBITDA Protection Before Audits Start?

How Do You Build Wound Care EBITDA Protection Before Audits Start?

Wound care EBITDA protection is built before the audit letter arrives — through billing infrastructure, documentation discipline, and revenue cycle systems that make your claims defensible on day one. CMS finalized the Calendar Year 2026 Physician Fee Schedule (CMS-1832-F), effective January 1, 2026, reclassifying most skin substitutes as flat-rate “incident-to” supplies at $127.28 per square […]

Read More.. How Do You Build Wound Care EBITDA Protection Before Audits Start?

Is Your Dermatology Practice Losing Revenue Due to Coding Lag?

Is Your Dermatology Practice Losing Revenue Due to Coding Lag

Yes, your dermatology practice is losing revenue due to coding lag—with high-volume dermatology practices collecting $1M–$5M+ monthly experiencing $1.2M–$3.6M annual revenue leakage when the time gap between patient encounters and claim submission extends from the 24–48 hour benchmark to 7–14 days, creating systematic denial patterns (40% higher than specialty benchmark), timely filing violations ($180,000–$420,000 annually), […]

Read More.. Is Your Dermatology Practice Losing Revenue Due to Coding Lag?

What Is the Ideal Net Collection Ratio for Physician Groups to Protect Margins?

What Is the Ideal Net Collection Ratio for Physician Groups to Protect Margins?

The ideal net collection ratio for physician groups is 96%–99% — anything below 95% is not a benchmark shortfall, it is a revenue hemorrhage with a measurable dollar amount attached to it. With the CMS CY 2025 Physician Fee Schedule cutting average Medicare payment rates by 2.83% (conversion factor dropped to $32.35, down from $33.29 […]

Read More.. What Is the Ideal Net Collection Ratio for Physician Groups to Protect Margins?

Does CPT Code Utilization Move the Board, or Does EBITDA?

Does CPT Code Utilization Move the Board, or Does EBITDA

EBITDA moves the board, not CPT code utilization—because healthcare practices collecting $1M–$5M+ monthly can achieve 95%+ CPT code utilization accuracy and high procedural volume while experiencing negative EBITDA growth when systematic revenue cycle failures create $1.2M–$3.8M annual leakage through payer variance detection gaps, denial root-cause engineering failures, and net collection ratio suppression. For healthcare executives […]

Read More.. Does CPT Code Utilization Move the Board, or Does EBITDA?

Orthopedic Net Collection Ratio Benchmark: What Top Practices Do Differently?

Orthopedic Net Collection Ratio Benchmark: What Top Practices Do Differently?

The orthopedic net collection ratio benchmark separates practices collecting every dollar they are contractually owed from those quietly absorbing six-figure losses — and the gap between the two is almost never about case volume. High-performing orthopedic groups consistently hit a Net Collection Ratio (NCR) of 97%–99%. The national average sits at 89%–92%. On a $3M […]

Read More.. Orthopedic Net Collection Ratio Benchmark: What Top Practices Do Differently?

How Staffing Shortages Are Impacting OB Coding Accuracy

How Staffing Shortages Are Impacting OB Coding Accuracy

Staffing shortages are impacting OB coding accuracy by creating $1.2M–$3.8M annual revenue leakage for OBGYN practices collecting $1M–$5M+ monthly—because the 30% certified medical coder shortage combined with 31% of healthcare staff considering leaving forces existing coders to process 40–60% higher claim volumes under burnout conditions, resulting in systematic undercoding errors ($1,582 per provider weekly in […]

Read More.. How Staffing Shortages Are Impacting OB Coding Accuracy

How Do You Master Anesthesia Time Unit Calculation for Maximum Revenue?

How Do You Master Anesthesia Time Unit Calculation for Maximum Revenue?

Anesthesia time unit calculation divides total continuous anesthesia minutes by 15 to determine billable time units. Add those to procedure base units, apply qualifying circumstance modifiers, then multiply by the 2026 CMS Conversion Factor of $20.4976 to get your reimbursable amount. Formula:  (Base Units + Time Units + Qualifying Units) × $20.4976 CF = Reimbursement […]

Read More.. How Do You Master Anesthesia Time Unit Calculation for Maximum Revenue?

The 50% Post-Op Collection Loss Problem

The 50% Post-Op Collection Loss Problem

The 50% post-op collection loss problem affects surgical practices and ASCs collecting $1M–$5M+ monthly when post-operative complications—seromas requiring aspiration, hematomas needing drainage, extended wound care, and readmissions—generate $1.8M–$4.2M in annual unbilled or under-billed services because practices lack the denial root-cause engineering infrastructure to capture aspiration codes, secondary procedure billing, and complication management revenue while simultaneously […]

Read More.. The 50% Post-Op Collection Loss Problem

Which Dry Eye Disease Billing CPT Codes Maximize Your Optometry Revenue in 2026?

Which Dry Eye Disease Billing CPT Codes Maximize Your Optometry Revenue in 2026?

The dry eye disease billing CPT codes that maximize optometry revenue in 2026 are 83861 (tear osmolarity, ~$44.96 bilateral), 68761 (punctal occlusion, now capped at 6 lifetime plugs under VSP), G2211 (longitudinal complexity add-on for E/M visits), and 0207T for automated MGD evacuation — each requiring specific modifier strategies and documentation protocols to survive payer […]

Read More.. Which Dry Eye Disease Billing CPT Codes Maximize Your Optometry Revenue in 2026?

Is Value-Based Documentation Replacing Volume-Based Billing in 2026?

Is Value-Based Documentation Replacing Volume-Based Billing in 2026

Yes, value-based documentation is systematically replacing volume-based billing in 2026—with CMS establishing dual conversion factors creating a 0.51% payment differential ($170,000–$306,000 annually for practices collecting $3M–$5M+ monthly) favoring Advanced APM participants, introducing Advanced Primary Care Management codes eliminating time-based documentation requirements, and implementing AI-driven claim scrutiny that penalizes volume-focused documentation patterns—forcing primary care practices to […]

Read More.. Is Value-Based Documentation Replacing Volume-Based Billing in 2026?
888-357-3226